Community Solar News logo Subscribe by RSS

September 24, 2026

First Time for Everything: Wisconsin Debuts, Illinois Goes All In

Milwaukee makes its first appearance on the show with a nearly 7 MW community solar project built to power city buildings instead of individual subscribers. Then Illinois notches another first: PureSky Energy's McLean 1, the state's first community solar farm built entirely for low and moderate income households, with real dollar figures behind it.

Listen & watch on RSS Feed Spotify YouTube Apple Podcasts Amazon Music

Featured This Episode

Read the Transcript

Ray: Welcome to Community Solar News! I'm Ray.

Della: And I'm Della. Ray, I don't think we've ever done a Wisconsin story.

Ray: Huh. You're right. Cheese state's been cheese free on this show, at least until today.

Della: Fixing that immediately. What have you got?

Ray: Milwaukee. We Energies and the city just cut the ribbon on a community solar project out near Mitchell International Airport. Nearly seven megawatts.

Della: Seven's a nice round number. What's it actually doing?

Ray: Powers about two thousand homes worth of generation. And this is the part I like: the output offsets usage at eighty city buildings.

Della: Wait, eighty buildings? That's not a subscriber roster, that's basically municipal infrastructure.

Ray: Right, this one runs through We Energies' Renewable Pathway Program, so it's built for exactly that. Big anchor style offtake instead of a pile of individual signups.

Della: Smart. You don't need a marketing budget if the subscriber is the city itself.

Ray: Honestly, more utilities should be doing this. Every project that runs entirely on individual subscriber signups is basically funding a small marketing operation on the side. That's real friction, real cost, real time before you're generating revenue.

Della: So your hot take is: make the utility or the city the anchor, skip the acquisition headache?

Ray: For a slice of the capacity, yeah. You still want individual subscriber projects, that's where the bill savings actually reach households. But eighty city buildings locked in on day one beats hoping enough signups land before your interconnection deadline.

Della: One thing though. This doesn't directly touch a resident's bill, right? The subscriber here is the city, not a household. So the win is municipal budget stability, not somebody's individual savings.

Ray: Fair distinction. Cheaper city operations does mean less pressure on the budget that funds those buildings in the first place, but that's indirect. I don't want us implying every Milwaukee resident's bill drops because of this one.

Della: Good, say it like that. It's an infrastructure story, not a subscriber story.

Ray: The airport-adjacent siting is smart too, honestly. That's not land anybody's rushing to put housing on, but it works fine for equipment.

Della: Easier permitting story too, probably. Nobody's fighting you over sightlines from a runway buffer.

Ray: Prediction: another Midwest city copies this exact model within the year. Municipal buildings as the whole anchor tenant.

Della: I'll take that bet, but next time you have to name an actual city, not just 'a city'.

Ray: Noted. Fair.

Ray: For anybody building in Wisconsin listening to this, worth flagging: We Energies running it through a named program, the Renewable Pathway Program, usually means there's a defined process to plug into rather than a one-off handshake deal.

Della: Right, so that's the door to knock on first if you're a developer in that territory.

Ray: Exactly the kind of thing that'd end up in our own Solar Docket rundown, honestly.

Della: Free plug for our other free thing. Efficient.

Della: Can't really argue with the model though. Who showed up for the ribbon cutting?

Ray: Mayor Cavalier Johnson, and Alderman Scott Spiker. Ribbon, speeches, the whole ceremony.

Della: I love a ribbon cutting. Genuinely. It's the one part of this beat that actually looks like it sounds.

Ray: And it's a first for the show. First Wisconsin story we've ever run.

Della: Took us long enough.

Ray: Well, we get there. Point is, welcome to the map, Wisconsin.

Della: Speaking of the map, Ray, you might want to sit down. It's Illinois again.

Ray: Della, no.

Della: Della, yes.

Ray: I feel like we say this every single week.

Della: Because it happens every single week. I'm not doing this to you, the state's just busy.

Ray: Fine. Give it another month, I bet we finally skip a week. What have you got?

Della: PureSky Energy just switched on McLean 1, and it's the first community solar farm in Illinois built entirely, not partially, entirely, for low and moderate income households.

Ray: Entirely meaning every subscriber slot is LMI only?

Della: Every one. It's under Illinois Solar for All, so that's the design from day one, not a carve out bolted onto a normal project.

Ray: What's PureSky's angle here structurally, though? A project that's entirely LMI subscribers is a different underwriting story than a normal community solar farm.

Della: Has to be. You're not blending in higher-margin subscribers to average things out. The economics have to work on that fifty percent discount by itself.

Ray: So somebody underwrote this assuming the fifty percent discount from day one, not as a nice-to-have bolted on later.

Della: That's really the whole point of Illinois Solar for All. The discount isn't optional, it's the design.

Ray: Hot take: most of this beat still treats LMI access as a bolt-on, a carve-out inside a bigger project. This is the opposite model, and I think it's the harder one to pull off financially, which is exactly why it's worth flagging.

Della: Agreed. And it's a small project, under two megawatts. You don't need scale to do this right, you need the program design.

Ray: Quick gut check since it's an all-LMI project. What's it actually take for somebody to qualify as a subscriber here?

Della: Household income tied to the area median, standard Illinois Solar for All eligibility. They didn't spell out the exact threshold in this release, so I'm not going to guess a number we don't have.

Ray: Fair. But worth a look for anybody in McLean County wondering if they qualify, check the Illinois Solar for All program page directly.

Della: Good call, we'll link it in the show notes.

Ray: Wait, isn't that the same program we did that whole segment on back in August? The one that finally hit its stride, beat its first five years combined in a single year?

Della: Same program. This is what that pipeline looks like when it actually lands as a project instead of a line on a dashboard.

Ray: Okay, I like that a lot more than a dashboard update. Numbers?

Della: 1.98 megawatts DC. A little under thirty four hundred modules, three thousand three hundred sixty four if you want the exact count. Expected to generate around 3.13 million kilowatt hours a year. They're calling that roughly four hundred thirty nine homes worth.

Ray: Wait, three thousand three hundred sixty four? That's oddly specific for a press release.

Della: I like it when they give you the real count instead of rounding it into a marketing number.

Ray: And the subscriber math?

Della: Here's the part that actually matters for the people on this show. Subscribers get half off, fifty percent of the value of their solar credits, and that's built into the program design. Not a promotional discount that fades after year one.

Ray: So it holds.

Della: It holds. PureSky's own estimate is about five point four million dollars in customer savings, over thirty years.

Ray: That's a real number for a household budget, not a rounding error.

Della: Kind of reminds me of the Torrence audit back in July, that Sauk Village project that published real first year savings instead of just a projection. This one's still a projection, but same instinct: show your work.

Ray: Hot take then. Every LMI project should have to publish that audit eventually. A projected number and a press release is easy. Real dollars a year in is the actual test.

Della: Put that on the record as a prediction. We check back on McLean 1's actual numbers whenever PureSky publishes them.

Ray: Deal.

Ray: If this design holds up, I wouldn't be surprised to see other states push their program administrators toward all-LMI allocations instead of the usual blended approach.

Della: Worth watching. Different state, different program rules, but the logic transfers fine.

Della: And they didn't build this alone. Ecology Action Center and Habitat for Humanity of McLean County were partners on it, which tells you somebody was doing outreach and enrollment on the ground, not just engineering.

Ray: Habitat for Humanity of McLean County, so at least one of those is very clearly a local partner, not some national enrollment vendor parachuting in.

Della: Same instinct with naming Ecology Action Center directly instead of burying the partnership in fine print.

Ray: That's the part nobody puts in the press release photo.

Della: It's in ours. McLean County, Illinois. Noted.

Ray: Illinois keeps showing up on this show. I'm just going to say it.

Della: You say it every time.

Ray: Because it's true every time.

Ray: If I had to pick a favorite today, it's the Illinois one. The design-from-day-one part.

Della: See, I actually love the municipal offtake idea more. Fewer moving parts, adoption locked in from day one instead of built up over months.

Ray: We'll agree to disagree.

Della: As usual.

Della: You know what today actually was, though? Two different answers to the same question: who's the subscriber. Milwaukee made it the city itself. Illinois made it, explicitly, the households who need the discount most.

Ray: Same industry, same week, two completely different answers.

Della: Kind of the whole beat in miniature.

Ray: I like that. Put it in the notes.

Ray: Bigger picture for anybody building right now, that's two more examples in the who's-your-anchor conversation. A municipality, or a dedicated low-income allocation baked into the discount from the start.

Della: Either one beats hoping the general market shows up on its own and fills your capacity block.

Ray: Different pipeline, same lesson.

Ray: So what are we actually watching for next?

Della: McLean 1's real subscriber numbers whenever PureSky publishes them, and whether your Midwest copycat prediction on the municipal model lands.

Ray: And whether Illinois actually takes a week off. I'm not holding my breath.

Della: Nobody is.

Della: That's the rundown. Two firsts today: a new state on the board, and a new kind of project in a state we apparently live in now.

Ray: Before we let you go, quick word from the folks who make this show possible.

Ray: Community Solar News is brought to you by Our Power Co. You build the solar, we bring the community.

Della: That's really the whole pitch. Our Power Co. does community solar customer acquisition, filling subscriber capacity for projects, wherever you're building.

Ray: And if you're listening as a homeowner or renter instead of a developer, wrong show, but also, go to join community dot solar to sign up and lower your own bill.

Della: On the responsible AI note: this show is made almost entirely with AI, and we're picky about which tools we use. We go with the ones that cover their own energy and grid costs and use water efficient cooling, instead of passing that on to local households and small businesses.

Ray: On an energy show, felt like the least we could do.

Della: And every number we said today is sourced and linked in the show notes.

Ray: One more thing before we go. If you want the day to day between episodes, we publish The Solar Docket, a free daily rundown of what actually moved in community solar. Filings, capacity blocks, deals, with a quick read on what each one means. It's at community solar dot news.

Della: Find us on Spotify, Apple, Amazon, or watch the video on YouTube, wherever's easiest.

Ray: And head to community solar dot news for the newsletter.

Della: That's the community in community solar.

Sources & Credits

← All Episodes